• About Us
  • Write For Us
  • Privacy Policy
VIP Articles
Subscribe
Defensionem - The WarBible
  • War in Ukraine
  • Books
  • Short Posts
  • VIP
  • Aviation
  • Land
  • History
  • Sea
  • Countries
    • China
    • India
    • Middle East
    • Russia
    • South America
    • Syrian Conflict
    • United States of America (USA)
    • United Kingdom (UK)
No Result
View All Result
  • War in Ukraine
  • Books
  • Short Posts
  • VIP
  • Aviation
  • Land
  • History
  • Sea
  • Countries
    • China
    • India
    • Middle East
    • Russia
    • South America
    • Syrian Conflict
    • United States of America (USA)
    • United Kingdom (UK)
No Result
View All Result
Defensionem
[dm-modal]
Home Countries Russia

The Long Russian Road to the Next Generation Tank

by Adrian Mocanu
2 years ago
in Russia
Reading Time: 5 mins read
0

The Long Russian Road to the Next Generation Tank

Image 35905

The Soviet Union and subsequently Russia, have long strived to come up with the next generation of main battle tank, the next brilliant idea that would give it the edge over tank designs from the West. Certainly, the Soviet Union has had its fair share of revolutionary (or evolutionary) ideas that subsequently either influenced or changed tank design for good:

  • The T-55 was the first tank with NBC protection fitted as standard.
  • The T-62 was the first tank with a smoothbore gun capable of firing APDS.
  • The T-64 was the first MBT to be equipped with an autoloader, an automatic fire suppression system and composite armour.
  • Russia came up with the Drozd: The first soft kill APS ever fitted to a tank (more precisely, the naval infantry operated T-55AD).
  • The T-90 was the first tank serially produced with a soft kill APS (Shtora) fitted…

Sovershestvovanie-88 and Object 195

Yet, for many reasons, the road to the next generation MBT was never straightforward for Moscow. In the late 1980s, the Soviet Union launched “Sovershestvovanie-88”, a plan to modernize the Soviet Union’s armed forces and weapon platforms. UralVagonZavod came up with the Object 195 MBT.

Object 195 was meant to be a tank 2 to 3 times more survivable than its contemporaries. A crew of two would sit in an armoured capsule inside the tank hull. The turret being unmanned and operated remotely. It was also designed with an increased first hit kill probability, sporting a massive 152mm main gun (2A83) coupled with a coaxial 30mm autocannon (2A42). The design was a departure from the usual low-profile philosophy seen on previous Soviet tanks. This was mainly due to the extra space needed to accommodate the 152mm gun’s breech block. The suspension was hydro-dynamic to improve cross-country mobility and hit probability on the move. The engine was an A-85-3 turbocharged diesel unit producing up to 1,650BHP. Finally, a digital diagnostic system was to be installed in the crew capsule and datalink was also to be provided for better communication and situational awareness… The chassis was meant to be modular so as to be used by other platforms and the whole vehicle was designed to be easily upgraded over a period of 30 years, which was the projected service life of the vehicle.

Object 195 was first mothballed in the early 1990s when a cash-strapped Russia went for the cheaper upgrade that was the T-90. The project was restarted in the early to mid-2000s before being finally cancelled in favour of the T-14 Armata. All this, despite a prototype having been built and apparently successfully tested. It is, however, clear to see the legacy of the Object 195 in the current T-14, with many ideas having been carried across from one project to the other by UralVagonZavod.

Image 35906

Competition and Object 640 Black Eagle

However, UralVagonZavod was not the only design bureau to compete in order to supply a tank for the “Sovershestvovanie-88” plan. Leningrad’s Kirov Plant (current day St-Petersburg) came up with the Object 640 Black Eagle project. Object 640 was subsequently refined and developed by OmskTransMash. The prototype appeared in public in 1997 and was revolutionary by both Russian and Western standards: The driver’s position was moved back toward the center of the hull, in an armoured capsule. The tank commander and gunner were in the turret, but almost at floor level with their heads roughly where the turret ring is. The ammo carousel found in previous Soviet designs was gone and replaced by a huge ammo bustle at the back of the turret. The ammo bustle integrated a horizontal autoloader and blow-off panels that would have vented any explosion upward and sideways, away from the crew compartment. The resulting design enabled the tank to have a very low silhouette. Frontal arc and turret had spaced steel and composite armour covered by ERA, rumoured to be either Kontakt-5 or Kaktus. The side and rear armour was much thinner but the vehicle was fitted with Arena or Drozd-2 Active Protection System. The top of the turret also had thick armour and ERA bricks to protect from top-attack systems such as the Javelin. The setup was completed by the installation of the Shtora soft kill APS. The tank was meant to be equipped with a 1500hp gas turbine engine and a 125mm gun that could be upgraded to a 152mm gun. Sadly enough, the Russian state in the 1990s had no money and the Omsk plant was even poorer: It went bust in 2002. Omsk was later incorporated into UralVagonZavod but money for the project was not available and it was shelved. The Black Eagle was no more. However, it is clear that UralVagonZavod had a good look into the Object 640 blueprints before starting work on the T-14 Armata… In fact, both Object 195 and Object 640 have left a legacy visible in all modern Russian tank designs, not only in the T-14: Armour packages, datalink, ammo bustle, soft and hard kill APS systems, armoured crew compartment/capsule, digital diagnostic tools and so on… Many of those systems have trickled down to current and latest T-72 and T-90 variants.

Battlefield Support Vehicles

The road to come up with a special purpose/tank support vehicle wasn’t easy either! We all know the BMPT Terminator, but its roots also go back to the “Sovershestvovanie-88” plan!

But to know more about those earlier designs and prototypes, you’ll have to go on our website, here: https://defensionem.com/the-long-russian-road-to-the-next-generation-tank-and-hifv/

Tags: defensionem-fb-article
ShareTweet

Adrian Mocanu

I am pursuing International Relations and European Studies at the University of Bucharest, being in my second year.

Related Posts

Ukraine on the backfoot
Donbass/Crimea Watch

Ukraine on the backfoot

October 21, 2024
138
Russia

1K17 Szhatie/Compression: Soviet Laser Tank

June 21, 2024
100
Russia

Mascot of the Stary Oskol Kilo class submarine.

May 27, 2024
26
Russia

NATO Northern Distribution Network: When Russia Helped NATO

April 30, 2024
22
Russia

Ukraine 2022: A Tale of Three (Russian) Soldiers

April 18, 2024
7
Russia

Put your SOKS on!

April 1, 2024
0
Next Post

Written in May 2020 as part of an article on Russian A2AD (or what the west perceives as being Russia's A2AD doctrine).

The Luftwaffe’s Last Battle

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • War in Ukraine
  • Books
  • Short Posts
  • VIP
  • Aviation
  • Land
  • History
  • Sea
  • Countries
Contact Us: contactus@defensionem.com

© 2020 Defensionem - The WarBible - a reliable source of information about conflicts & weapon systems from the world over.

No Result
View All Result
  • War in Ukraine
  • Books
  • Short Posts
  • VIP
  • Aviation
  • Land
  • History
  • Sea
  • Countries
    • China
    • India
    • Middle East
    • Russia
    • South America
    • Syrian Conflict
    • United States of America (USA)
    • United Kingdom (UK)

© 2020 Defensionem - The WarBible - a reliable source of information about conflicts & weapon systems from the world over.

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?