US Strike On Syria: What We Know

Defensionem US Strike On Syria: What We Know

US Strike On Syria: What We Know. President Trump ordered a limited strike on Assad’s forces stationed at the Shayrat Airfield that was related to the chemical attack that had killed civilians. The attack consisted of 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles launched from the Arleigh Burke-class destroyer’s USS Ross and USS Porter stationed in the Eastern Med.

Contrary to earlier reports Russia and their troops stationed at the Shayrat Airfield were given prior warning to the strike. It’s been stated by the White House that the strike was targeting air defense stations,  jets,  hardened structures, and the airstrip its self but was not intended to inflict large casualties.

Pentagon spokesman Captain Jeff Davis said in an official statement: “Russian forces were notified in advance of the strike using the established deconfliction line. U.S. military planners took precautions to minimize risk to Russian or Syrian personnel located at the airfield.”

The Syrian government has said 5 casualties have been reported from the base in Homs. A twitter account associated with the regime has claimed Syrian Brigadier General Khalil Issa Ibrahim, commander of the second battalion of the 136th Air Defense Brigade of the Syrian Army has been killed in the first volley of Tomahawks as AA stations were first to be hit.

The strike was intended to remind Assad, North Korea, Russia, and China that the U.S. and by extension President Trump is willing to backup policy with force.  The strike occurred during dinner between Trump and China’s President Xi Jinping, reaffirming to China the President’s has no qualms to back up his words.

So far the Russian response has been limited with denouncing the strike and calling for a U.N. meeting. The Russians used the base to forward deploy attack helicopters and had heavily retrofitted and invested in the base.

The U.S. has stated that this was purely a U.S. operation and did not ask any allies for support though the U.K., Austrlia, Saudi Arabia, and Isreal have all announced support for the strike. NATO was informed before the operation.


While the amount of Tomahawks fired would have likely overwhelmed any AA system in Syria I personally think the Russians chose not to engage the missiles. Who also knows how much time the Russians were given to chose a reaction. May have been little as 30 minutes to force a quick decision by Putin to abandon AA stations.

So far the reactions by the Russians have been mild but they expectedly have condemned the attack. The Syrians have done the same. The U.S. currently has hundred of troops in Syria fighting and they could be subjected to a retaliatory attack. Though I doubt Assad would counter strike them as the U.S. would surely respond with overwhelming force.

It’s an interesting world we live in.


Jackson Robertson
Writing articles, columns and blogs about the forever changing political and military landscape.

More articles


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here